http://math-blog.com/2009/07/23/rejecta-mathematica-goes-live/ Mathematics is wonderful! Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:16:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://math-blog.com/2009/07/23/rejecta-mathematica-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-7507 alfC Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:09:24 +0000 http://math-blog.com/?p=199#comment-7507 the idea sounds interesting. But the crackpot expectiation unfortunately was reinforced when I tried to read the issue. My sample of one (1) article (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 58-83) it was a complete nonsense, it teaches you how to add vectors and numbers. the idea sounds interesting. But the crackpot expectiation unfortunately was reinforced when I tried to read the issue.
My sample of one (1) article (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 58-83) it was a complete nonsense, it teaches you how to add vectors and numbers.

]]> http://math-blog.com/2009/07/23/rejecta-mathematica-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-7022 Manjil P. Saikia Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:04:34 +0000 http://math-blog.com/?p=199#comment-7022 Its a good step forward because who knows we may find another great idea in the rejected papers. Its a good step forward because who knows we may find another great idea in the rejected papers.

]]> http://math-blog.com/2009/07/23/rejecta-mathematica-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-6976 Joakim Munkhammar Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:49:44 +0000 http://math-blog.com/?p=199#comment-6976 Despite the probability (inevitability) of totally disoriented errogenous papers, I think "Rejecta Mathematica" is a step in the right direction for open science. It leaves room for a form of public review process. This was a very interesting blog entry. Despite the probability (inevitability) of totally disoriented errogenous papers, I think “Rejecta Mathematica” is a step in the right direction for open science. It leaves room for a form of public review process. This was a very interesting blog entry.

]]>