<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unreasonable Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/</link>
	<description>Mathematics is wonderful!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. McGowan</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-10653</link>
		<dc:creator>John F. McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-10653</guid>
		<description>Grigori Perelman, Reclusive Russian Math Genius, Refuses $1 Million Prize 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/grigori-perelman-reclusiv_n_511938.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grigori Perelman, Reclusive Russian Math Genius, Refuses $1 Million Prize </p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/grigori-perelman-reclusiv_n_511938.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/grigori-perelman-reclusiv_n_511938.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Cangiano</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Cangiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>Thanks John. I saw that yesterday, and I plan to have a small article about it up on Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John. I saw that yesterday, and I plan to have a small article about it up on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. McGowan</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-9104</link>
		<dc:creator>John F. McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-9104</guid>
		<description>March 18, 2010

First Clay Mathematics Institute Millennium Prize Announced Today

Prize for Resolution of the Poincaré Conjecture Awarded to Dr. Grigoriy Perelman 

http://www.claymath.org/poincare/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 18, 2010</p>
<p>First Clay Mathematics Institute Millennium Prize Announced Today</p>
<p>Prize for Resolution of the Poincaré Conjecture Awarded to Dr. Grigoriy Perelman </p>
<p><a href="http://www.claymath.org/poincare/" rel="nofollow">http://www.claymath.org/poincare/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealAbq</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-7721</link>
		<dc:creator>NealAbq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-7721</guid>
		<description>Dr Perelman spent 7 years on the Poincaré proof. 

That was 7 years ago. 

Time to start watching arxiv.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Perelman spent 7 years on the Poincaré proof. </p>
<p>That was 7 years ago. </p>
<p>Time to start watching arxiv.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emanuel Barros</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>Emanuel Barros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>Excellent Article!

I have read many books over the years on mathematics and mathematical geniuses and I agree that the level of concentration and dedication can make many seem nutty.  The truth is social convention.  If someone isolates themselves and focuses on one thing for years, they will lose track of a lot of social dynamics that the rest of us take for granted.  It is also true that gifted mathematical minds are wired differently and do exhibit psychological ailments.  The rigorous mathematical work can bring things ailments to the fore front.  Perelman may be anti-social, but he may just be angry that someone else is trying to claim credit for something he worked long and hard to achieve.  I would be angry as well in his shoes.  The vultures always show up when they smell the hint of a rotting corps.  In this case the corpse would be Perelman&#039;s seeming retreat from possibly great opportunities in the field of mathematics.  Starting with the decline of the Fields Medal.  Or!  Maybe he&#039;s smarter than we give him credit for and now he is truly remembered and immortalized by having declined the Fields Medal and all those opportunities.  He could come back and accept the medal and take the opportunity he really wanted.  I suppose that remains to be seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Article!</p>
<p>I have read many books over the years on mathematics and mathematical geniuses and I agree that the level of concentration and dedication can make many seem nutty.  The truth is social convention.  If someone isolates themselves and focuses on one thing for years, they will lose track of a lot of social dynamics that the rest of us take for granted.  It is also true that gifted mathematical minds are wired differently and do exhibit psychological ailments.  The rigorous mathematical work can bring things ailments to the fore front.  Perelman may be anti-social, but he may just be angry that someone else is trying to claim credit for something he worked long and hard to achieve.  I would be angry as well in his shoes.  The vultures always show up when they smell the hint of a rotting corps.  In this case the corpse would be Perelman&#8217;s seeming retreat from possibly great opportunities in the field of mathematics.  Starting with the decline of the Fields Medal.  Or!  Maybe he&#8217;s smarter than we give him credit for and now he is truly remembered and immortalized by having declined the Fields Medal and all those opportunities.  He could come back and accept the medal and take the opportunity he really wanted.  I suppose that remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grenzenlos</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-7706</link>
		<dc:creator>grenzenlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-7706</guid>
		<description>Anyone with perseverance and talent, besides from solving Poincaré&#039;s conjecture, can rule the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone with perseverance and talent, besides from solving Poincaré&#8217;s conjecture, can rule the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Dzekounov</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-7705</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Dzekounov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-7705</guid>
		<description>It looks like Dr Perelman has not left mathematics - according to Arxiv one of the papers &quot;Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds&quot; was last edited on Dec 21, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Dr Perelman has not left mathematics &#8211; according to Arxiv one of the papers &#8220;Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds&#8221; was last edited on Dec 21, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward M. Stadum</title>
		<link>http://math-blog.com/2010/01/31/an-unreasonable-man/comment-page-1/#comment-7704</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward M. Stadum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math-blog.com/?p=327#comment-7704</guid>
		<description>The characterization of Perfect Rigor as exhibiting an &quot;unremittingly hostile&quot; and &quot;jealous&quot; view of Perelman is in my opinion utterly unjustified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The characterization of Perfect Rigor as exhibiting an &#8220;unremittingly hostile&#8221; and &#8220;jealous&#8221; view of Perelman is in my opinion utterly unjustified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

