In Walter Rudin’s autobiography The Way I Remember It, he comments on a calculus book defining it as “too good to be widely used” and further states that:

Widely used calculus books must be mediocre. — W. Rudin

The temptation to discard that statement as elitist may be strong, but it is worth noticing how there is so much truth to it. Education is embracing a dangerous downward spiral towards the oversimplification of mathematics in favor of letting every student pass, despite their actual understanding of the subject.

Dumbing down mathematics is a dangerous trend which affects students at all levels, from primary school where children are no longer taught how to perform division by following the standard algorithm to a complete emphasis on anti-racist mathematics and calculus courses where delta and epsilon are not mentioned while teaching limits, because they are considered to be “too complicated” or “too confusing” for most students. Of course, this is not the case everywhere, and bright students who study on their own will always exist (despite the fact that the social satire of Idiocracy may be more accurate that we like to think).

This problem exists because educational changes such as these reflect negatively on the competence level of the average student, meaning that a decent chunk of the next generation of mathematicians, engineers and scientists will be facing increasingly complex, unsolved problems and challenges with an inadequate amount of preparation. Most students have a tendency to adapt their study levels around the difficulty of the examinations they will be exposed to. In other words, no matter how easy a Calculus course is, there will always be a majority of C students. Making the courses dumber has only resulted in the creation of artificial A, B and C students who wouldn’t stand a chance against a C student of the 50’s, in terms of understanding and mastering the subject.

It is therefore very important to consider what are the great classical books available that can provide a solid basis for studying mathematics and that can guide, inspire and enlighten the student who wishes to learn mathematics the way it should be. To be factual there are still institutions which adopt valid textbooks and didn’t jeopardize their curricula too much, but that’s not the general rule unfortunately. What are then the best Calculus books? “Best” is very relative to the student, but in this context I will consider what is “best” for relatively bright students who have a genuine interest in calculus/mathematics. Books that I myself have found very appealing to me, and therefore my list is declaratively biased. All of the following books do a very good job of covering the material, explain the subject matter well, have mathematical rigor, proofs for the most important theorems, challenging exercises, and are able to really teach *Calculus I* at a sufficiently high level. Each of the books listed below is able to enlighten, guide and inspire the reader who is willing to put the time and effort into going through them:

- Calculus by Michael Spivak (
**Updated in July 2008!**): I can’t praise this book high enough, to me this is THE calculus book. It has a great selection of topics, careful and extremely rigorous proofs, and it goes well beyond the scope of calculus, so much so that a better title would be “Introduction to the beauty of Real Analysis”, because it really bridges between calculus and more advanced real analysis, showing how beautiful mathematics is. Spivak literally guides you in a enlightening experience, discovering Calculus, starting from the properties of the numbers and building on top of it. The examples are very meaningful, the explanations are clear, and the subject is so well presented and motived. It is, in my opinion, one of the most inspirational mathematics books I’ve ever read. The exercises proposed at the end of each chapter test different levels of understanding and don’t fail to challenge the reader on the subject. These are exercises which really make you feel like you are taking a second course on the topic. In fact, I’d say that the exercise sections of this book are especially valuable, and you’re highly encouraged to work through all of them. This book is great for anyone who is serious about mathematics and who wishes to have a very solid foundations upon which to face the challenges of more advanced courses down the road. Spivak’s book comes with a few selected solutions to odd numbered problems, but if you are self-studying or are disciplined enough, you may want to consider the associated answers book (which by the way is in print, despite what Amazon lists on their pages). - Introduction to Calculus and Analysis, Volume 1 by Richard Courant and Fritz John: a classical, well thought introduction to Calculus and Analysis in one variable, where explanations are very clear and the material is covered in a way which provides a good deal of motivation. The approach is more practical and less abstract than other Calculus books, while conserving a perfect balance between mathematical rigor and intuition. This book comes with plenty of exercises that will reinforce the knowledge of the student. The abundance of physics applications, make it ideal for physics majors and engineers as well. This is the first volume of a trilogy republished by Springer, if you are serious about Calculus, you may want to also consider the other two more advanced volumes: Volume II/1 and Volume II/2. An absolutely beautiful set of books.
- Calculus, Vol. 1: by Tom M. Apostol: a very comprehensive book, methodical in the theorem/proof approach, adopted by many high-end universities as a first year textbook for courses in calculus or calculus and theory. Its coverage of the subject is impressive and provides a good selection of standard exercises. It is an excellent reference and textbook, albeit you may find it a bit dry and less inspirational than others at first, but you will eventually develop an appreciation of its teaching method. You may want to note that this is the first volume, and that the second volume is also worth getting: Calculus, Vol. 2: Multi-Variable Calculus and Linear Algebra with Applications.
- A Course of Pure Mathematics by G.H. Hardy: this is the 10th edition of a book first published in 1908 by the great mathematician G.H. Hardy. It is a classic textbook that brought much needed rigor, and reformed the way math was taught in the UK in the twentieth century. This book is intentionally written to address the brightest students of the time, therefore it is a very inspirational and enthusiastic piece of work with plenty of elegant proofs and suggestions, and exercises that are definitely very challenging. For example, there are exercises coming from the Math Tripos examinations (at Cambridge) from early part of the last century, and they will definitely keep you busy for some time. Some notations are a bit outdated and it is mostly an introduction to real analysis that may be a bit too much as a first book. But this book is a masterpiece nevertheless, and it’s a classic that as a mathematician you will want to have in your library. I think it’s ideal as a reference and as a supplement to other textbooks (e.g., Spivak).

More than just calculus, these also serve as introductions to Analysis, and in general to mathematics at an undergraduate level. They are challenging, not for the faint heart, but ultimately a joy for math lovers.

**Sponsor’s message**: Math Better Explained is an insightful ebook and screencast series that will help you deeply understand fundamental mathematical concepts, and see math in a new light. Get it here.

#### Get more stuff like this

Get interesting math updates directly in your inbox.

What, exactly, is wrong with “anti-racist mathematics”?

From the link you gave, it seems that the goals are to promote the historicity of mathematical contributions by, for example, the Indians and Muslims, who were doing algebra and number theory for centuries before Europe got the Bernoulli clan, and Gauss, and the German schools. European mathematics and science (including and especially the Greeks) were shambles until the Eastern influence inspired people like Newton and Gauss.

The other goals seem to be to not ascribe talents or deficits to “races”, so that students internalize the mathematical content, instead of internalizing an “I can’t do this because I’m _______” attitude.

Obviously, this is a positive movement which promotes historicity

alongsidethe mathematical content.“Anti-racist mathematics” is left-wing political propaganda and a poison to the classroom environment.

For there to be a need for so called “anti-racist” mathematics assumes that regular mathematics is racist, which is stupid because mathematics has nothing to do with race issues at all. If it’s history you’re worried about then don’t be because I’ve never come across a single math book/text that denies (for example) that ancient Babylonians and Egyptians were among the first astronomers and inventors of geometry, or that the Persian Al-Khwarizmi invented algebra, or that our modern base-10 counting system has its origins in ancient India, or that the most basic ingredients of calculus were known before Newton and Leibniz were born, and so on.

If anyone is interested in learning about the history of mathematics then that’s a subject of its own and should not take up class time that would otherwise be used to teach actual mathematics. Knowing whether it was Newton, Leibniz, or someone else who invented calculus first does not help you in the slightest when it comes to understanding calculus.

Can you please take a moment to comprehend just how ridiculous this “anti-racist mathematics” idea is. I remember a friend in high-school who struggled with trigonometry. Now after all these years I finally understand! It’s not that he didn’t do enough practice questions nor that he skipped classes. It’s because the mathematics curriculum is racist! Oh, dear, how I wish I could go back in time and tell him that it was the Babylonians and not Pythagoras who first conceived of what we today call the Pythagorean Theorem. Damn, I bet if he had just known that fact then he wouldn’t have failed so many trigonometry tests.

The whole idea is so absurd that some sociopolitical windbags who in all likelihood never got beyond elementary school times-tables suddenly feel that they know how mathematics should be taught. Give me a break!

Sorry, for the new post. I meant for my previous comment to be a reply to Alexander Jimenez’s post.

This is my new favorite comment on the Internet.

Thanks for the advice!

What would you say the best textbooks are for more advanced calculus, such as a text to follow Spivak?

I find calculus interesting. But it is not included in the school syllabi until 11th grade. It is included in engineering maths actually.

I really was not very good at maths, although I did obtain an A-grade in “Further Mathematics” at UK A-Level standard in the 1980s.

Anyway, the one thing I absolutely loved about my maths course was an early 20th-century book (1940s?) of calculus exercises in blue hard cover. These books were long out of print, and the teachers made us swear that we would return our copies because there were so few still in serviceable condition.

I miss the book to this day, which is how I ended up here. The school was Eton College. If I track it down, I will let you know.

I don’t recall much these days, but I remember lots of rotating rigid bodies, and also how the answers (listed at the back) always seemed to reduce to rational numbers or a multiple of one of the important irrational constants.

Another fun part was the units were all in e.g. hundredweight or other archaic measures, and I delighted in some of the unit dimensions you could end up with.

If I track it down, I’ll try and remember to post back here.

As far as I can tell, “anti-racist mathematics” never existed and is actually right-wing propanganda.

The reason math has been dumbed down has nothing to do with liberalism. It is the same reason all higher education has been dumbed down: because middle class parents demand that their middle class kids be able to get college degrees so that they can continue to be middle class.

And that’s not social liberalism :fail:

any good indian author for beginining calculus please

Differential Calculus by Shanti Narayan.

I like Granville’s text. I have a copy of the 1943 updated edition with Smith and Longley that my father was issued in WW2 (awesomely small and portable, flexible but strong binding, great explanations but not long winded, enough problems and solutions, etc.) My copy is also literally battle-tested (the old man did amphib landings in the South Pacific). 😉

I actually found it just as good as my much bigger, thicker, glossier Calc I/II book (which was quite decent, but a little more long-winded, can’t remember the name). Granville covered all of what you would have in Calc I/II (or Calc BC). Included a little bit on series and introductory diff e q (as a calc BC book would).

I used the War Dept edition for self-study and liked it a lot. Also very easy to look things up in and great table of integrals at the back.

There are scans of the pre 1923 (public domain) editions out there.

One good beginners school book will be TEACH YOURSELF CALCULUS by abbott. Its the most simple pocket calculus book I have come across. I got it from my father.

Does anybody have an opinion about the book “Calculus” by David Patrick? It’s part of the Art of Problem Solving series.

The author of this article never did explain how anti-racist mathematics, which according to his citation consists of nothing more than enumerating the contributions of non-white people to mathematics and not using racist stereotypes in word problems, can dumbdown mathematics education. It’s seriously depressing that it’s become fashionable to dismiss everything out of hand about improving race relations in the US (which suck) as Marxist or left wing or sjw or whatever the demon of today is.

It’s hard to reply to your comment, nine years after the article was written. Part of me wants to reply based on my thinking at the time, and part of me wants to reply with my current ideas and thoughts. I’ll do both.

As a humanist, I’ve always been in favor of inclusiveness and equality (in gender, race, etc). Though anti-racist mathematics was not at all the key point of my article at the time, when I wrote this I considered the emphasis on anti-racism in math class to be somewhat of a distraction.

Specifically, I thought that focusing more on history and artificially including lesser contributions for the sake of striking a balance between euro-centric mathematical discoveries and discoveries elsewhere, would be trading real math time in favor of political correctness.

Nothing wrong with political correctness or anti-racism, but at the time I felt they didn’t really belong in math class.

Today, I think that:

– Anti-racist mathematics, on the whole, is a worthwhile effort. I suspect that, much like another commenter pointed out, the misrepresentation of its intentions was mostly right-wing propaganda. I remember reading articles about it at the time and it was portraited as something much different than it turned out to be. (For example, an article from 2005 claimed that a school in Newton, MA put so much emphasis on anti-racist math, that students failed tests en masse.)

– Cultural biases do have an impact on the struggles of many non-white students, more so in other subjects, but in mathematics as well. So I think it’s worth examining textbooks and tests for glaring examples of biases that would negatively impact students. We don’t have to go overboard, a la SJWs that you mention, but there are genuine biases worth removing.

– Role models are extremely important, especially in one’s formative years. So including mathematicians that defy stereotypes can also have a positive influence on young minds. I’m obviously still against a core curriculum that focuses on history rather than fundamentals, but that didn’t turn out to be the case, at any rate, so we don’t have much to worry about.

Excellent. Thanks for clarifying the concise remarks in your original posting. Your point about role models is extremely important, and in that regard we should remember to include female role models as well as those of varying ethnicity. Too much talent is left untapped if we fail to do so. The commenters with ideological blinders seemingly have little constructive to add to the conversation. We should be striving to allocate more resources to fields such as mathematics if we seriously want to make real progress.

Gracias. El libro de Spivak está muy bien explicado y me ayuda mucho. La verdad no soy estudiante de Matemáticas, sin embargo hay conceptos que no se entienden bien porque deben ser correctamente explicados, incluso a veces demostrados pasito a pasito en pizarra y eso a veces en la universidad no se hace porque muchos profesores asumen que el alumno “debe saber”. En mi carrera, Farmacia, solo basta aprender a resolver problemas, y eso hace que el alumno solo se limite a memorizar la técnica y muy raras veces pregunta porqué lo hace así, no los culpo. Por ejemplo, no siempre se explica bien la definición épsilon-delta del límite, ni se explica detalladamente porqué epsilon y delta deben “igualarse” o que uno se exprese en términos del otro, mis compañeros solo saben que deben hacerlo porque sí. Pero yo sí quiero saber bien los conceptos y material como el que describió está muy bien recomendado.

Nuevamente muchas gracias.